[OMPI devel] Barrier/coll_tuned/pml_ob1 segfault for derived data types

2012-06-14 Thread Eugene Loh
I see a segfault show up in trunk testing starting with r26598 when tests like ibm collective/struct_gatherv intel src/MPI_Type_free_[types|pending_msg]_[f|c] are run over openib. Here is a typical stack trace: opal_convertor_create_stack_at_begining(convertor = 0x689730, sizes),

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Remove non-standard MPI_MAX_NAME_LEN constant

2012-06-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > I believe we use that constant in several places to define a static array > size - you might check to be safe. I can't find it used anywhere in the code base other than mpi.h.in. It's a non-standard name (i.e., it's not in the MPI spec). I b

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Remove non-standard MPI_MAX_NAME_LEN constant

2012-06-14 Thread Ralph Castain
I believe we use that constant in several places to define a static array size - you might check to be safe. On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > WHAT: Remove non-standard MPI_MAX_NAME_LEN from mpi.h. > > WHY: It looks like this was a carryover from LAM/MPI, but it's not in any M

[OMPI devel] RFC: Remove non-standard MPI_MAX_NAME_LEN constant

2012-06-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
WHAT: Remove non-standard MPI_MAX_NAME_LEN from mpi.h. WHY: It looks like this was a carryover from LAM/MPI, but it's not in any MPI spec. WHERE: mpi.h TIMEOUT: This seems non-controversial, so I'll set the timeout to the teleconf next Tuesday: June 19, 2012 -- More details: MPI_MAX_NAM

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hide btl segment keys within btl

2012-06-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
This sounds like a good thing to me. +1 On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > What: hide btl segment keys from PML/OSC code. > > Why: As it stands new BTLs with larger segment keys (smcuda for example) > require changes in both OSC/rdma as well as the PMLs. This RFC makes will >