Yes, it really should have been fixed by now. :-\
Thanks for the nudge in reminding us -- I've bumped George to review this again
(he's the owner of this particular section of code).
On Jul 30, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Iliev, Hristo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago I opened a ticket about an ext
On the SVN trunk HEAD, when I run the following across 30 servers (at ppn=1):
mpirun --mca btl openib,self $hostfile
$HOME/svn/ompi-tests/intel_tests/src/MPI_Iprobe_tag_c
I get oodles of the following error messages:
[svbu-mpi010][[21194,1],7][btl_openib_endpoint.c:689:mca_btl_openib_endpoi
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone else recently had tried to run trunk
configured with --enable-mpi-thread-multiple and an MPI program that
passed MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE to MPI_Init_thread on a machine using the
openib btl?
I'm seeing even very basic programs hang. If it is working for you,
what archit
oops, thanks Ralph, overlooked that one...
Edgar
On 7/31/2012 11:08 PM, svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Author: rhc (Ralph Castain)
> Date: 2012-08-01 00:08:47 EDT (Wed, 01 Aug 2012)
> New Revision: 26934
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/26934
>
> Log:
> Add missing in
r26918 was the previous nightly tarball -- the create failure was in making the
current nightly tarball. So it's something that happened during the day
yesterday that caused the failure (e.g., some header file was forgotten to be
added to a Makefile.am).
I think Ralph fixed it in r26934. I'll
I've just built from openmpi-1.9a1r26918.tar.bz2 on a Linux/x86-64 machine
w/o any problems.
So, that would seem to discount something missing from the tarball.
-Paul
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Agreed - but I checked and didn't see anything missing. will take
> ano
Agreed - but I checked and didn't see anything missing. will take
another look...
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> The most likely reason for a "distcheck" to fail in this manner when a
> checkout is fine would be a header not getting included in the tarball due to
> some
The most likely reason for a "distcheck" to fail in this manner when a
checkout is fine would be a header not getting included in the tarball due
to some omission from Makefile.am
-Paul
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I'm not sure what to make of this one. I checked the
I'm not sure what to make of this one. I checked the code out and built it just
fine on a linux box, including watching this file build. For whatever reason,
the tarball maker just didn't find some include file?
On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:33 PM, MPI Team wrote:
>
> ERROR: Command returned a non-z
