[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.6a1r4731)

2012-08-14 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.6a1r4731 Start time: Tue Aug 14 21:01:01 EDT 2012 End time: Tue Aug 14 21:04:40 EDT 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r27035 - trunk/orte/util

2012-08-14 Thread Ralph Castain
yes tim, i'm aware of it - this just needed to be fixed quickly so lanl could operate. On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Tim Mattox wrote: > Is a linear search actually necessary? Is there some order to the > vpid's in the array? > I would hope you could do a binary search,

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r27035 - trunk/orte/util

2012-08-14 Thread Tim Mattox
Is a linear search actually necessary? Is there some order to the vpid's in the array? I would hope you could do a binary search, or if the vpid's are unordered, then hopefully this is a rarely invoked code path. Just thinking of scalability. On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM,

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: MPI_Mprobe

2012-08-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
Noted in https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/3218#comment:4. On Aug 14, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > On 8/14/12 8:30 AM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > >> On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: >> >>> That's incorrect. Fortran statuses should

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.6.1rc1 posted

2012-08-14 Thread Paul Kapinos
Hi Jeff, Hi All, On 08/07/12 18:51, Jeff Squyres wrote: So I'm not 100% clear on what you mean here: when you set the OFED params to allow registration of more memory than you have physically, does the problem go away? We are talking about machines with 24GB RAM (S) and 96GB RAM (L). The

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: MPI_Mprobe

2012-08-14 Thread Barrett, Brian W
On 8/14/12 8:30 AM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote: >On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > >> That's incorrect. Fortran statuses should never be passed to C >> interfaces. If you look at testany_f.c, for example, a temporary status >> is created and then passed to

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: MPI_Mprobe

2012-08-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > That's incorrect. Fortran statuses should never be passed to C > interfaces. If you look at testany_f.c, for example, a temporary status > is created and then passed to the C binding I think the issue is that there is a mix of both

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: MPI_Mprobe

2012-08-14 Thread Barrett, Brian W
On 8/8/12 11:28 PM, "Eugene Loh" wrote: >On 8/7/2012 5:45 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> So the issue is when (for example) Fortran MPI_Recv says "hey, C ints >>are the same as Fortran INEGERs, so I don't need a temporary MPI_Status >>buffer; I'll just use the INTEGER array