Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: fix various leaks in trunk (touches coll/ml, vprotocol, pml/v, btl/openib, and mca/base)

2012-11-05 Thread George Bosilca
+1! george. On Nov 5, 2012, at 18:59 , Jeff Squyres wrote: > +1 on the ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_mca.c and > opal/mca/base/mca_base_param.c. > > I didn't check the others. > > > On Nov 5, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > >> What: I used valgrind on ompi_info and found several

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: fix various leaks in trunk (touches coll/ml, vprotocol, pml/v, btl/openib, and mca/base)

2012-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
+1 on the ompi/mca/btl/openib/btl_openib_mca.c and opal/mca/base/mca_base_param.c. I didn't check the others. On Nov 5, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > What: I used valgrind on ompi_info and found several leaks in the trunk. This > patch fixes some of the leaks. > > pml/v: > - If vp

[OMPI devel] RFC: fix various leaks in trunk (touches coll/ml, vprotocol, pml/v, btl/openib, and mca/base)

2012-11-05 Thread Nathan Hjelm
What: I used valgrind on ompi_info and found several leaks in the trunk. This patch fixes some of the leaks. pml/v: - If vprotocol is not being used vprotocol_include_list is leaked. Assume vprotocol never takes ownership (see below) and always free the string. coll/ml: - (patch verified) c

[OMPI devel] RFC: fix frameworks usage of opal_output (updated)

2012-11-05 Thread Nathan Hjelm
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 07:22:42PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 19:07 , Nathan Hjelm wrote: > > > I was going to address this second inconsistency with another patch but now > > seems like a good time to get a see if anyone has an opinion about how this > > should be fix

[OMPI devel] MPI-3 feature list

2012-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
FYI -- George and I updated the wiki this morning: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/MPIConformance -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [OMPI devel] [MTT users] Open MPI MTT is moving

2012-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
I just want to publicly thank Josh and DongInn (Indiana U. Sys Admin -- the guy who handles all of Open MPI's hosting needs) for all the work that was required to do this move. None of you saw all the behind-the-scenes work to make this changeover, but let me tell you: it too many hours of Josh

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI MTT is moving

2012-11-05 Thread Josh Hursey
The MTT server migration went well this weekend. I have updated the Open MPI website to redirect you appropriately to the new MTT Reporter. You will need to update your .ini files to submit your tests to the new server at the address below: https://mtt.open-mpi.org/submit/ Let me know if you ex

Re: [OMPI devel] About Marshalling and Umarshalling

2012-11-05 Thread N.M. Maclaren
On Nov 5 2012, Ralph Castain wrote: We adhere to the MPI standard, so we expect the user in such an instance to define a datatype that reflects the structure they are trying to send. We will then do the voodoo to correctly send that data in a heterogeneous environment, and pass the data back

Re: [OMPI devel] About Marshalling and Umarshalling

2012-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 5, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > We adhere to the MPI standard, so we expect the user in such an instance to > define a datatype that reflects the structure they are trying to send. We > will then do the voodoo to correctly send that data in a heterogeneous > environment, and

Re: [OMPI devel] About Marshalling and Umarshalling

2012-11-05 Thread Ralph Castain
We adhere to the MPI standard, so we expect the user in such an instance to define a datatype that reflects the structure they are trying to send. We will then do the voodoo to correctly send that data in a heterogeneous environment, and pass the data back (in the defined datatype) to the user o