Re: [OMPI devel] "Open MPI"-based MPI library used by K computer

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Done -- thank you! On Jan 11, 2013, at 3:52 AM, "Kawashima, Takahiro" wrote: > Hi Open MPI core members and Rayson, > > I've confirmed to the authors and created the bibtex reference. > Could you make a page in the "Open MPI Publications" page that > links to Fujitsu's PDF file? The attached f

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread George Bosilca
Long story short. It is freshly forked from the OMPI trunk, patched with topi-fixes (and not topo-fixes-fixed for some reason). Don't whack them yet, let me take a look more in details. George. On Jan 18, 2013, at 17:10 , "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote: > Ok. If it contains everything y

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Ok. If it contains everything you put on the original topo-fixes (and topo-fixes-fixed), I might as well kill those two repos and put your repo URL on the ticket. So -- before I whack those two -- can you absolutely confirm that you've got everything from the topo-fixes-fixed repo? IIRC, ther

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread George Bosilca
It's a fork from the official ompi (well the hg version of it). We will push back once we're done. George. On Jan 18, 2013, at 15:42 , "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote: > George -- > > Should I pull from your repo into > https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes-fixed? Or did you eff

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
George -- Should I pull from your repo into https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes-fixed? Or did you effectively fork, and you guys will put back to SVN when you're done? On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:47 AM, George Bosilca wrote: > Takahiro, > > The MPI_Dist_graph effort is happening in

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:43 PM, "Kawashima, Takahiro" wrote: > Fujitsu is interested in completing MPI-2.2 on Open MPI and Open MPI > -based Fujitsu MPI. > > We've read wiki and tickets. These two tickets seem to be almost done > but need testing and bug fixing. > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI (not quite) on Cray XC30

2013-01-18 Thread George Bosilca
Luckily for us all the definitions contain the same constant (orte). r27864 should fix this. George. On Jan 18, 2013, at 06:21 , Paul Hargrove wrote: > My employer has a nice new Cray XC30 (aka Cascade), and I thought I'd give > Open MPI a quick test. > > Given that it is INTENDED to be A

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127

2013-01-18 Thread George Bosilca
Takahiro, The MPI_Dist_graph effort is happening in ssh://h...@bitbucket.org/bosilca/ompi-topo. I would definitely be interested in seeing some test cases, and giving this branch a tough test. George. On Jan 18, 2013, at 02:43 , "Kawashima, Takahiro" wrote: > Hi, > > Fujitsu is intereste

[OMPI devel] Open MPI (not quite) on Cray XC30

2013-01-18 Thread Paul Hargrove
My employer has a nice new Cray XC30 (aka Cascade), and I thought I'd give Open MPI a quick test. Given that it is INTENDED to be API-compatible with the XE series, I began configuring with CC=cc CXX=CC FC=ftn --with-platform=lanl/cray_xe6/optimized-nopanasas However, since this is Intel h/w,