Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7rc8 is posted

2013-02-28 Thread Pavel Mezentsev
Regarding the Open64. It's that strange thing that I need two different versions of the compilers: one for Opteron family 15h and one for general x86-64 architecture. This makes things quite complicated since my head node doesn't have Opteron family 15h processor. You can have a look at this topic:

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7rc8 is posted

2013-02-28 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Feb 28, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Pavel Mezentsev wrote: > Do you mean the logs from failed attempts? They are enclosed. If you need the > successful logs I'll need to make them again since the files from successful > builds are deleted. You guessed right; I need the logs from the failed builds.

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Remove pml/csum

2013-02-28 Thread Ralph Castain
The component was required to resolve a problem on a specific cluster that was never observed elsewhere. That cluster is now being decommissioned, so no point in maintaining the support for it. On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:45 AM, "Kenneth A. Lloyd" wrote: > Is that because end-to-end checksums don'

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7rc8 is posted

2013-02-28 Thread Pavel Mezentsev
Do you mean the logs from failed attempts? They are enclosed. If you need the successful logs I'll need to make them again since the files from successful builds are deleted. I am not using MXM. The results with the option you suggested are the same as before: #---

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Remove pml/csum

2013-02-28 Thread Kenneth A. Lloyd
Is that because end-to-end checksums don't match? -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Hjelm Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:54 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: [OMPI devel] RFC: Remove pml/csum What: svn rm t