Hi Paul,
okay, I have compiled the sources from the trunk and it works fine now...
Sorry to have reported a duplicate...
It will be in the next 1.6.X release?
Thanks,
Eric
Le 2013-04-23 20:46, Paul Hargrove a écrit :
Eric,
Are you testing against the Open MPI svn trunk?
I ask because on Ap
Eric,
Are you testing against the Open MPI svn trunk?
I ask because on April 9 George commited a fix for the bug reported
by Thomas Jahns:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2013/04/12268.php
-Paul
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Eric Chamberland <
eric.chamberl...@giref.ulaval
Hi Jeff,
thanks for your answer!
You inserted a doubt in my mind... and gave me hope... :-)
So I did some modifications on the code to help everyone:
1- it's now in "C"... :-)
2- Concerning your remark about arbitrary address: I am now using the
"offsetof" macro defined in "stddef.h" to compu
On Apr 23, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 03:40 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> So other than openmpi expecting to work with a specific version of
> libevent, I'm not seeing compelling reason why bun
On 04/17/2013 03:40 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
So other than openmpi expecting to work with a specific version of libevent,
I'm not seeing compelling reason why bundling is necessary (at least for Fedora
packaging). If there is, please let
Sorry for the delay.
My C++ is a bit rusty, but this does not seem correct to me.
You're making the datatypes relative to an arbitrary address (&lPtrBase) in a
static method on each class. You really need the datatypes to be relative to
each instance's *this* pointer.
Doing so allows MPI to r
another information: I just tested the example with Intel MPI 4.0.1.007
and it works correctly...
So the problem seems to be only with OpenMPI... which is the default
distribution we use... :-/
Is my example code too long?
Eric
Le 2013-04-23 09:55, Eric Chamberland a écrit :
Sorry,
here i
Sorry,
here is the attachment...
Eric
On 04/23/2013 09:54 AM, Eric Chamberland wrote:
Hi,
I have sent a previous message showing something that I think is a bug
(or maybe a misuse, but...).
I worked on the example sent to have it simplified: now it is almost
half of the lines of code and the
Hi,
I have sent a previous message showing something that I think is a bug
(or maybe a misuse, but...).
I worked on the example sent to have it simplified: now it is almost
half of the lines of code and the structures are more simple... but
still showing the wrong behaviour.
Briefly, we co
