Hmmm...working for me, though with an earlier version of Slurm.
It looks like you are seeing a failure in Job_Getid in the libpmi2 support. I
wonder if you have a problem in that library? Can you check the arguments going
to it? Perhaps the max value length is too big or something?
You might al
ya, i'm fixing it now
On Oct 1, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Joshua Ladd wrote:
> Also getting a compile failure in the trunk:
>
> ./autogen.pl && ./configure
> --prefix=/hpc/home/USERS/joshual/ompi_trunk/really-the-trunk/ompi-install
> --with-mxm=/hpc/local/src/mxm2_release --with-fca=/opt/mellanox/f
Also getting a compile failure in the trunk:
./autogen.pl && ./configure
--prefix=/hpc/home/USERS/joshual/ompi_trunk/really-the-trunk/ompi-install
--with-mxm=/hpc/local/src/mxm2_release --with-fca=/opt/mellanox/fca --with-pmi
&& make -j 9 && make install
CC ess_slurm_module.lo
CCLD
I am getting the following failure on two hosts, 1 proc per host. We are
running SLURM 2.6.2.
joshual@mir13 ~/ompi_1.7/openmpi-1.7.3rc1/examples
$mpirun -np 2 -bynode hostname
*** buffer overflow detected ***: mpirun terminated
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0
In the usual place:
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.7/
Please test.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Scheduling's going to be difficult with SC, Thanksgiving, MPI Forum, and
Christmas, but I could do a separate trip. Once I get this stupid
one-sided code finished, I'm supposed to work on MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE
support for the MTLs for a Sandia project, so it's pretty easy to justify.
Sandia would b
Depends on people's travel ability - are people able to do a dedicated trip? If
not, then we may just have to try to focus the meeting tightly to one or two
topics, I suppose
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:18 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
wrote:
> Fair enough. Got a counter proposal? :-)
>
> On Oct
Fair enough. Got a counter proposal? :-)
On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> My only concern is that we've tried tagging on the end of the Forum before,
> and I'm not convinced there is adequate time. This schedule essentially
> leaves us some time Thurs afternoon and then Fri
My only concern is that we've tried tagging on the end of the Forum before, and
I'm not convinced there is adequate time. This schedule essentially leaves us
some time Thurs afternoon and then Fri morning, which is hardly worth the trip
for us non-Forum types.
If we want to really tackle thread
A taxi or shuttle would be faster and is probably not unreasonably expensive:
http://www.flychicago.com/OHare/EN/GettingToFrom/Transport_Between_Airports/Transport-Between-Airports.aspx
-Dave
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Ok, that should be fine. Its a long way to MDW on t
Ok, that should be fine. Its a long way to MDW on the L (> 1 hr) but it can't
be helped.
-Nathan
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:09:43PM +, David Goodell (dgoodell) wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:56 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" w
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:56 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" wrote:
>
>> I could catch a flight out of ORD instead of MDW if required, but would
>> prefer not to have to get a rental car; is there a taxiable option to the
>> Rosemont facility?
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:56 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" wrote:
> I could catch a flight out of ORD instead of MDW if required, but would
> prefer not to have to get a rental car; is there a taxiable option to the
> Rosemont facility?
Yes. You can taxi or train to the Cisco office from ORD.
We have ha
On 10/1/13 9:46 AM, "Nathan Hjelm" wrote:
>
>On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:42:15PM +, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> Ralph brought up the idea of a face-to-face developers meeting
>>yesterday. How about piggybacking on the December Chicago MPI Forum
>>meeting?
>>
>> 1. The Forum starts 1pm
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:42:15PM +, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Ralph brought up the idea of a face-to-face developers meeting yesterday.
> How about piggybacking on the December Chicago MPI Forum meeting?
>
> 1. The Forum starts 1pm Mon, Dec 9, and runs through ?11am? Thu, Dec 12 (i
Ralph brought up the idea of a face-to-face developers meeting yesterday. How
about piggybacking on the December Chicago MPI Forum meeting?
1. The Forum starts 1pm Mon, Dec 9, and runs through ?11am? Thu, Dec 12 (it
might be later -- like noon or something; I don't remember). It's at the
Micr
With a size of 3 doubles all requests are going out in the eager mode. The data
will be copied into our internal buffers, and the MPI request will be marked as
complete (this is deep MPI voodoo, I'm just trying to explain the next
sentence). Thus all sends will look as asynchronous from a user p
George,
well the code itself runs fine, its just that the ompi send list
keeps allocating memory, and I pinpointed it to this single call.
Probably the root problem is elsewhere, but it appears to me that the
entries in the send list are not released for reuse after the
operation complete
18 matches
Mail list logo
