Re: [OMPI devel] Issue with MPI_Put in version 1.8.3

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Should be fixed on *master* now... :) Sent from my phone. No type good. > On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:11 PM, "Nathan Hjelm" wrote: > > Should be fixed on trunk now. There were a couple of minor issues in the > PSCW path. CMR'd to 1.8. > > -Nathan > >> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:09:33PM +0200, Berk

Re: [OMPI devel] Issue with MPI_Put in version 1.8.3

2014-10-07 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Should be fixed on trunk now. There were a couple of minor issues in the PSCW path. CMR'd to 1.8. -Nathan On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:09:33PM +0200, Berk Hess wrote: >Hi, > >I am implementing RMA in the Gromacs molecular simulation package and ran >into an issue while using a relative

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: calloc instead of malloc in opal_obj_new()

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
This is now done: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/commit/a422d893b8e63347deb71bbaaa14ca25ddb1f192 On Oct 3, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Jeff, > > Using calloc() only subject to --with-valgrind sounds good to me. > If I'd known such a option exists, I'd not have suggested th

Re: [OMPI devel] Issue with MPI_Put in version 1.8.3

2014-10-07 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Thanks for the reproducer. I am taking a look now. BTW, MPI_Win_allocate is preferred over MPI_Win_create. It allows the MPI implementation more opportunities to optimize. -Nathan On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:09:33PM +0200, Berk Hess wrote: >Hi, > >I am implementing RMA in the Gromacs mol

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI commits] Git: open-mpi/ompi branch master updated. dev-49-g86f1d5a

2014-10-07 Thread Mike Dubman
Unfortunately, it does not happen in my mtt runs but at customer cluster with no access. If there is an agreement that flow in question is a result of internal bug it is better we caught it earlier and not let garbage in/out but use the power of community to trace it at other mtt setups as well.

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI@GitHub: (Mostly) Open for business

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Sounds perfect. On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: > Jeff, > > that should not be an issue since github provides the infrastructure to > filter bozo requests (requests are sha1 signed with a shared secret) > https://developer.github.com/webhooks/securing/ > > Cheers, > >

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI@GitHub: (Mostly) Open for business

2014-10-07 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet
Jeff, that should not be an issue since github provides the infrastructure to filter bozo requests (requests are sha1 signed with a shared secret) https://developer.github.com/webhooks/securing/ Cheers, Gilles On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > On Oct 7, 2014, at

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI commits] Git: open-mpi/ompi branch master updated. dev-49-g86f1d5a

2014-10-07 Thread Ralph Castain
This may be me mis-communicating with Mike off list. I had suggested he add this "feature" to help in catching a rare race condition in his MTT runs. However, I had expected him to do it on his private branch, not commit it to the main repo. I agree that I'm not sure what I think about it for the

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI commits] Git: open-mpi/ompi branch master updated. dev-49-g86f1d5a

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
I'm not sure how I feel about this commit: 1. It blindly ignores the "return" statement. I.e., if the intent for this commit was to kill the process, that "return" statement should have been deleted, too. 2. We clearly decided a long time ago that removing an item from a list from which it do

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI@GitHub: (Mostly) Open for business

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:57 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: > so far, using webhooks looks really simple :-) Good! > a public web server (apache+php) that can > a) process json requests > b) issue curl requests > is required strictly speaking. My only request would be to ensure that appropriate se

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI@GitHub: (Mostly) Open for business

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Oct 5, 2014, at 10:55 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: > i gave it a little thoughts and that does not seem to hard to achieve. Great. > ghi https://github.com/stephencelis/ghi is a cli to manage (among other > things) labels, milestones and assignee > > the elegant way would be to use webho

[OMPI devel] Issue with MPI_Put in version 1.8.3

2014-10-07 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, I am implementing RMA in the Gromacs molecular simulation package and ran into an issue while using a relatively simple setup with MPI_Put with Open MPI version 1.8.3. I made a small test program, see attachment, which reproduces the issue. The issue is that the data passed to MPI_Put arriv

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI devel] OMPI@GitHub: (Mostly) Open for business

2014-10-07 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet
Jeff, here is a quick update : so far, using webhooks looks really simple :-) a public web server (apache+php) that can a) process json requests b) issue curl requests is required strictly speaking. i will keep working on a proof of concept Cheers, Gilles On 2014/10/06 11:55, Gilles Gouailla