Hi Jeff,
I can attend at that time.
todd
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Ryan / Sandia (anyone else who cares about MTL interfaces):
>
> Can you attend a webex tomorrow at 1pm US Central to discuss adding
> one-sided interfaces to the MTL? (it must be before
are you able to reproduce this error with ib verbs bw test? I hope, you are
running on lossless Ethernet fabric setup and selecting correct VLAN .
-Devendar
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Dave Turner
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 4:31 PM
To: de...@open-mpi.org
Hi Dave,
On 29/01/15 11:31, Dave Turner wrote:
> I've found some old references to similar mlx4 errors dating back to
> 2009 that lead me to believe this may be a firmware error. I believe we're
> running the most up to date version of the firmware.
There was a new version released a few
I'm testing RoCE on 40 Gbps Mellanox ethernet cards and am getting a
mlx4 QP operation error every time it gets to testing 132 kB packets. These
are aggregate tests in that 16 cores on one host are doing bi-directional
ping-pongs to 16 cores on another host across the Mellanox cards.
I'
MTL authors --
We had *some* discussion of MTL issues this afternoon in the room, but need
your input (since most of you are not here). Here's what we'd like to talk
about tomorrow (and we realize you might not have answers for this tomorrow).
Short version: based on Mellanox's experience, why
Here's a totally sweet command line script that does a lot of common Github
actions for you:
https://hub.github.com/
On OSX, you can install via Homebrew or ports. There's precompiled binaries
for Linux.
One common OMPI use case:
--
$ cd path_to_my_ompi_release_clone
$ hub checkout h
Great, thanks guys. I'll make a new webex for tomorrow and send it out.
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Burette, Yohann wrote:
>
> I care and will attend as well.
>
> Will you create a new webex for tomorrow or should we use the same one as
> today?
>
> Thank you,
> Yohann
>
> -Original
I care and will attend as well.
Will you create a new webex for tomorrow or should we use the same one as today?
Thank you,
Yohann
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Friedley, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 2:05 PM
To: Open MPI Devel
I care and can attend at that time.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
> Squyres (jsquyres)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:56 PM
> To: Open MPI Developers List
> Subject: [OMPI devel] MTL interfaces
>
> Ryan / Sandia (an
Ryan / Sandia (anyone else who cares about MTL interfaces):
Can you attend a webex tomorrow at 1pm US Central to discuss adding one-sided
interfaces to the MTL? (it must be before 2pm US Central)
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/we
The webex died when we went to lunch. Here's the new one we just started.
We're going to start with memkind:
https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/e.php?MTID=m49f6a7eaea454fc876bb129d526a66bf
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> I just created a webex for today's
I just created a webex for today's meeting. We're likely to go over some
topics that people care about (Nathan, Sandia).
Feel free to join whenever you want -- it's in-room audio, but of course, is no
substitute for being here. :-)
https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/e.php?MTID=m1f96c4d5e8bf685
The major agenda item for next Tuesday's call will be to review the results of
this week's face-to-face developer meeting.
We've only had 1 day so far, but it's fairly obvious that we need to share the
results, topics, and decisions that have been made at the meeting with everyone
who was not h
13 matches
Mail list logo
