Philipp,
You are right that libtool doesn't need to put "/usr/lib64/libltdl.so" in
the compiler command line as the *only* solution. I only meant that doing
so was preferred over the observed behavior of putting the full path of a
library for the wrong architecture. You are correct that passing
Hi Paul,
sorry for chiming in so late, but this list is on low priority for me at the
moment.
* Paul Hargrove (phhargr...@lbl.gov) [20150202 22:58]:
> is erroneous is that /usr/lib contains 32-bit libs (and target is 64-bit).
> Therefore libtool should have replaced -lltdl with /usr/lib64/libltdl
