I’m afraid that won’t solve the problem - the distro will still feel the need
to release -two- versions of OMPI, one with PSM and one with PSM2. Ordinarily,
I wouldn’t care - but this creates user confusion and reflects on us as a
community.
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 6:50 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet w
Ralph,
what about automatically *not* building PSM2 if PSM is built and PSM2 is
not explicitly required ?
/* in order to be future proof, we could even do that only if we detect
a symbol conflict */
we could abort if ompi is configure'd with both --with-psm and
--with-psm2, or simply do nothin
Hi folks
I regret to say that 1.10.0 is hitting an issue with at least one upstream
distro. Apparently, there is a symbol conflict between the PSM and PSM2
libraries that precludes building both of those MTLs at the same time. This is
leading the distro to push for release of two OMPI 1.10.0 bu
On 02/09/15 13:09, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> Instead PMI2 is in a contrib directory which appears to need manual
> intervention to install.
Confirming from the Slurm list that PMI2 is not built by default, it's
only the RPM build process that will include it without intervention.
Thanks for yo
