Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: RML change to multi-select

2016-03-17 Thread Howard Pritchard
Okay, i'll bring this up at the workshop. There's been talking but no one's working on it. 2016-03-17 8:20 GMT-06:00 Ralph Castain : > We are also targeting RDM for now, but I agree that the two may diverge at > some point, and so flexibility makes sense. Only wish that libfabric had a > decent

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: RML change to multi-select

2016-03-17 Thread Ralph Castain
We are also targeting RDM for now, but I agree that the two may diverge at some point, and so flexibility makes sense. Only wish that libfabric had a decent shared memory provider... > On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:10 AM, Howard wrote: > > I think that's a better approach. Not clear you'd want to use

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: RML change to multi-select

2016-03-17 Thread Howard
I think that's a better approach. Not clear you'd want to use same EP type as BTL. I'm going for RDM type for now for BTL. Howard Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 16.03.2016 um 09:35 schrieb Ralph Castain : > > Interesting! Yeah, we debated about BTL or go direct to OFI. Finally opted > for t

Re: [OMPI devel] How to 'hook' a new BTL to OMPI call chain?

2016-03-17 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet
if you did not configure with --disable-dlopen, you need to make install from opal/mca/btl/If if not, you need make install from your top builddir you can mpirun --mca btl_base_verbose 100 ... to see if your btl was found and did not somehow disqualify itself (for example because it's priority is