Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

All sounds like good reasons to amend the Bull test suite to no longer check for character and logical. :-) > On Apr 15, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Larry Baker wrote: > > I also remember reading in the past about problems with C sizeof and > multibyte characters. I just looked over the C90 standard.

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

I also remember reading in the past about problems with C sizeof and multibyte characters. I just looked over the C90 standard. In C90 code, the sizeof operator returns size_t in bytes. Except that it always returns 1 for char, signed char, or unsigned char. For an array, C90 says sizeof ret

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Be careful what you wish for. I remember looking at this issue a while ago, but I can't remember why or how I ran into it. I do remember convincing myself that the MPI standard was correct in restricting SIZEOF to numeric types. For one thing, a character variable type is a string container i

Re: [OMPI devel] psm2 and psm2_ep_open problems

I have a patch that I think will resolve this problem - would you please take a look?Ralph matias.diff Description: Binary data On Apr 15, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:Actually, it did come across the developer list :-)Why don’t I resolve this by just ensuring that the

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

No, we never imported the MPICH test suite to the ompi-tests repo on the argument that the MPICH test suite is continually under development; we wouldn't really want to snapshot it in our own repo. > On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:52 AM, DERBEY, NADIA wrote: > > Well, actually it's an old test suite (

Re: [OMPI devel] Fwd: psm2 and psm2_ep_open problems

Actually, it did come across the developer list :-) Why don’t I resolve this by just ensuring that the key we create is properly filled? It’s a trivial fix in the PMI ess component > On Apr 15, 2016, at 7:26 AM, Howard Pritchard wrote: > > I didn't copy dev on this. > > > > -- Weit

[OMPI devel] Fwd: psm2 and psm2_ep_open problems

I didn't copy dev on this. -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Von: *Howard Pritchard* Datum: Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 Betreff: psm2 and psm2_ep_open problems An: Open MPI Developers Hi Matias Actually I triaged this further. Open mpi PMI subsystem is actually doing things co

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Well, actually it's an old test suite (mpich2). We originally downloaded it a long time ago form http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpi/mpi-test/tsuite.html. And we changed a bunch of things to make it run in our test environment. I thought it was already in the MTT repo? Regards, Nadi

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Nadia, by any chance, could this test suite be contributed to the ompi-tests repository ? Cheers, Gilles On Friday, April 15, 2016, DERBEY, NADIA wrote: > Jeff, > > Actually, we have a functional test suite that used to pass for these > types and it fails now with v2.x. So I thought it was a

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:05 AM, DERBEY, NADIA wrote: > > Actually, we have a functional test suite that used to pass for these > types and it fails now with v2.x. So I thought it was a regression. Gotcha. > But from what you're saying, the new standard doesn't have a strong > requirement on LOGI

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

On Apr 15, 2016, at 8:49 AM, Kawashima, Takahiro wrote: > >> I just checked MPICH 3.2, and they *do* include MPI_SIZEOF interfaces for >> CHARACTER and LOGICAL, but they are missing many of the other MPI_SIZEOF >> interfaces that we have in OMPI. Meaning: OMPI and MPICH already diverge >> wi

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Jeff, Actually, we have a functional test suite that used to pass for these types and it fails now with v2.x. So I thought it was a regression. But from what you're saying, the new standard doesn't have a strong requirement on LOGICAL and CHARACTER. So I really don't mind, since I don't know w

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

> I just checked MPICH 3.2, and they *do* include MPI_SIZEOF interfaces for > CHARACTER and LOGICAL, but they are missing many of the other MPI_SIZEOF > interfaces that we have in OMPI. Meaning: OMPI and MPICH already diverge > wildly on MPI_SIZEOF. :-\ And OMPI 1.6 also had MPI_SIZEOF interf

Re: [OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Nadia -- I believe that the character and logical types are not in this script already because the description of MPI_SIZEOF in MPI-3.1 says that the input choice buffer parameter is: IN x a Fortran variable of numeric intrinsic type (choice) As I understand it (and my usual disclaimer her

[OMPI devel] Missing support for 2 types in MPI_Sizeof()

Hi, The following trivial example doesn't compile because of 2 missing types in the MPI_SIZEOF subroutines (in mpi_sizeof.f90). [derbeyn@btp0 test]$ cat mpi_sizeof.f90 program main !use mpi include 'mpif.h' integer ierr, sz, mpisize real r1