Hi Jeff,
>> 1. How about evaluating FUNNELED and SERIALIZED performance ?
>
> For Open MPI, it's basically THREAD_MULTIPLE and not-THREAD_MULTIPLE. I.e.,
> there's no real difference between SINGLE, SERIALIZED, FUNNELED
We were assuming that there would be cost due to
locking/synchronization in
On Jul 27, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> 1. New mails will start showing up there as they are sent across the lists.
> For example, the Open MPI "devel" list will show up under
Argh: that should have read:
For example, the Open MPI "devel" list will show up under
http
We have transitioned the Open MPI mailing lists to our new best friends at the
New Mexico Consortium (http://newmexicoconsortium.org/). Thank you, NMC!
For at least a little while, you'll see newmexicoconsortium.org in the footers
of our mailing list mails. Eventually, we hope to replace those
...and we're back.
NOTE: the email address for this list has now changed! It is now
@lists.open-mpi.org (it used to be @open-mpi.org).
PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONTACTS AND MAIL CLIENT FILTERS!
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> We are beginning the list mi
