Karol,
i was able to build openmpi 1.10.3 and run simple programs on tumbleweed
with updated glibc (2.24-436.59) i downloaded from
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Base:/System/openSUSE_Factory/x86_64/
would you mind describing the issue you faced with the updated glibc and
openmp
A run of "spell README" produces (after manual filtering) the following
misspelled words:
appliation
applicaions
availble
compatibile
libeveny
Memopy
paramater
relavant
specfic
It appears that us middleware authors don't know how to write
"applications" ;-)
README says:
- Open MPI's run-time
If my git is correct
$ git rev-list --boundary v2.x...master/master | grep '^-'
-acc2c7937cd3b50de16044b673399e4c4a7456bc
-6772d32b85b836438eeca72e4a8fda026ea67a55
-ec44a25070f99b6e1d96886fe3990ad560ee63c0
$ git show ec44a25070f99b6e1d96886fe3990ad560ee63c0
commit ec44a25070f99b6e1d96886fe3990a
Hi,
With respect to "master" branch, from which commit is v2.0.1 branched off ?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
- Sreenidhi.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:59 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> Dunno where the head-honcho’s are hiding, but per their request: the newest
> v2.0.1 release cand
Okay, I found the issue and fixed it:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/1340
We are very close to v2.0.1 release, so it may not get into that one. Still,
you are welcome to pull down the patch and locally apply it if it would help.
Ralph
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:29 PM, r...@open-mpi
My previous response was composed too quickly.
I should have said "successfully built and RUN".
-Paul
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> Thanks Paul !
>
>
> yes, this snapshot does include the patch i posted earlier.
>
> btw, the issue was a runtime error, not a buil
Thanks Paul !
yes, this snapshot does include the patch i posted earlier.
btw, the issue was a runtime error, not a build error.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 8/25/2016 12:00 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
Giles,
I have successfully built openmpi-v2.0.0-227-g917d293 (tonight's
nightly tarball) on Solari
Giles,
I have successfully built openmpi-v2.0.0-227-g917d293 (tonight's nightly
tarball) on Solaris 11.3 with both the Gnu and Studio compilers. Based on
Ralph's previous email, I assume that included the patch you had directed
me to (though I did not attempt to verify that myself).
-Paul
On We
Karol,
is there any place i can download glibc 2.24 for tumbleweed ?
i'd like to have a look at what is going wrong with openmpi 1.10
Cheers,
Gilles
On 8/25/2016 10:24 AM, Karol Mroz wrote:
Greetings!
I would like to upgrade our (openSUSE Tumbleweed) version of Open MPI
from 1.10.3 to
Hi Gilles,
Thanks for the speedy reply.
I'm using our existing spec file.
Tumbleweed is meant to be a rolling distribution, so I think 2.0.0 fits
well. I can always upgrade the package when 2.0.1 comes out. For
our Leap distribution, a more mature 1.10.x fits.
Thanks for confirming VT is out of
Karol,
it is correct vampirtrace was removed from Open MPI 2.0.0
are you using your own (or openSUSE) .spec file ? or the one provided by
Open MPI ?
fwiw, Open MPI 1.10.4 and 2.0.1 should be released in a near future.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 8/25/2016 10:24 AM, Karol Mroz wrote:
Greetings!
Greetings!
I would like to upgrade our (openSUSE Tumbleweed) version of Open MPI from
1.10.3 to the shiny new 2.0.0 :) This is motivated by a number of factors,
including an upgrade to glibc2.24 which breaks our current build of Open
MPI. I thought it a great time to push out a new version :D
The
Hmmm...bet I know why. Let me poke a bit.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Ben Menadue wrote:
>
> Actually, adding :oversubscribe to the --map-by option still disables
> binding, even with :overload on the --bind-to option. While the :overload
> option allows binding more than one process per CP
Actually, adding :oversubscribe to the --map-by option still disables binding,
even with :overload on the --bind-to option. While the :overload option allows
binding more than one process per CPU, it only has an effect if binding
actually happens - i.e. without :oversubscribe.
So, on one of our
Yeah, that man page could use some work...will add it to the list.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Ben Menadue wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Thanks for that... that option's not on the man page for mpirun, but I can
> see it in the --help message (as "overload-allowed", which also works).
>
> Cheer
Hi Ralph,
Thanks for that... that option's not on the man page for mpirun, but I can see
it in the --help message (as "overload-allowed", which also works).
Cheers,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
r...@open-mpi.org
Sent: Thursd
Ralph,
That will allow me to test much sooner.
-Paul
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:41 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> When you do, that PR has already been committed, so you can just pull the
> next nightly 2.x tarball and test from there
>
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
>
When you do, that PR has already been committed, so you can just pull the next
nightly 2.x tarball and test from there
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
> I am afraid it might take a day or two before I can get to testing that patch.
>
> -Paul
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at
I am afraid it might take a day or two before I can get to testing that
patch.
-Paul
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> Paul,
>
>
> you can download a patch at https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/
> open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/1336.patch
>
> (note you need re
Actually, I stand corrected! Someone must have previously requested it, because
support already exists.
What you need to do is simply specify the desired binding. If you don’t specify
one, then we will disable it by default when oversubscribed. This was done to
protect performance for those who
Hi folks
Looks like we will need to release a 1.10.4 to pickup a desired patch, and so I
plan to do so next week (week of Aug 29th). I know of one issue I’ve heard
about - please let me know if there are any others, and/or if someone wants any
additional changes in it. There are two outstanding
Well, that’s a new one! I imagine we could modify the logic to allow a
combination of oversubscribe and overload flags. Won’t get out until 2.1,
though you could pull the patch in advance if it is holding you up.
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:46 PM, Ben Menadue wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of our users
22 matches
Mail list logo
