On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Brian Barrett wrote:
> No! :)
>
> It would be good for everyone to read the Libtool documentation to
> see why versioning on the release number would be a really bad idea.
> Then comment. But my opinion would be that you should change based
> on interface changes,
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Any objections? We can discuss what approaches we want to take
> > (there's going to be some complications because of the PML driver,
> > etc.); perhaps in the Tuesday Mellanox teleconf...?
> >
> My main objection is that the only reason you propo
I'd propose using inttypes defines to handle this issue portably:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, bosi...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> -#define ORTE_TRANSPORT_KEY_FMT "%016lx-%016lx"
> +#define ORTE_TRANSPORT_KEY_FMT "%016llx-%016llx"
#include
#define ORTE_TRANSPORT_KEY_FMT "%016" PRIx64 "-%016" PRIx64
ch
