.nasa.gov/Software/NPB/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Galen
>
> On Mar 4, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Leslie Watter wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Some time ago, I was trying to implement a new BTL to openmpi.
> >
> > Now it works here, but I need to test it.
> >
> &
Hi All,
Some time ago, I was trying to implement a new BTL to openmpi.
Now it works here, but I need to test it.
Someone (sorry, I've forgot who), told me to use NetPIPE to test the BTL layer.
Ok, I used it, but now I need some parallel applications that uses openmpi.
NetPIPE uses a ping-pong te
se is useful, let me know if you have more questions.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> Leslie Watter wrote:
> > What I need? To know how and what functions is necessary to perform a
> > minimalist
> > implementation of a new btl, registering it and make it usable.
>
> Firs
ameslab.gov/netpipe/).
>
>george.
>
> On Jan 17, 2006, at 7:48 AM, Leslie Watter wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Do anyone knows a benchmark that can be used to compare the efficiency
> > of two BTL's (speed, latency, ...)?
> >
> > I've
Hi All,
Do anyone knows a benchmark that can be used to compare the efficiency
of two BTL's (speed, latency, ...)?
I've found this page with some benchmarks,
http://www.mfn.unipmn.it/~mino/cluster/benchmarks/?source=LinuxHPC.org#communication
but I prefer one that is known to work with openmpi.
Hi Jeff, Hi all,
The build system, at least, those things I've discovered, is very good,
isolating every part of the subsystems (BTL, OPAL, and so on)... Perhaps an
experience with autoconf and automake before this project make me fell
comfortable with it.
Some information that I'm looking for is
Hi people,
I'm trying to develop a new btl module using LLC protocol.
I've based the code on the TCP btl code and I'm experiencing some problems like:
--
mpirun noticed that job rank 1 with PID 1763 on node "servidor" exited
on signal 11.
1 process killed (possibly by Open MPI)
--
Is ther
