hi,
first of all, thanks for the info bill! i think i'm really starting to
piece things together now. you are right in that i'm working with a
6.x (6.2 with 6.1 devel libs ;) install here at cadence, without the
HPC extensions AFAIK. also, i think that are customers are mostly in
the same positio
hi again,
>>> i'll probably just continue experimenting on my own for the
>>> moment (tracking
>>> any updates to the main trunk LSF support) to see if i can figure
>>> it out. any
>>> advice the best way to get such back support into trunk, if and
>>> when if exists
>>> / is working?
>>
>> The
hi again,
[i'm going to snip out the sections that seem resolved]
[also, sorry about mutating the subject last time -- oops.]
This sounds fine - you'll find that the bproc pls does the exact same thing.
In that case, we use #ifdefs since the APIs are actually different between
the versions -
Welcome! Yes, Jeff and I have been working on the LSF support based on 7.0
features in collab with the folks at Platform.
sounds good. i'm happy to be involved with such a nice active project!
> 1) it appears that you (jeff, i guess ;) are using new LSF 7.0 API
features.
> i'm working to sup
hi everyone,
firstly, i'm new around here, and somewhat clueless when it comes to the
details of working with an big autoconfiscated project like
open-rte/open-mpi the svn checkout level ...
i've read some of the archives that turned up in searches for terms like
'LSF', and it would seem there w
