tmp/mpi_install_tmp26482/openmpi-1.7rc8/opal'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
I guess that this issue has more to do with the compiler than with OpenMPI.
Let me know if you need me to run any additional tests.
Regards, Pavel Mezentsev.
2013/2/28 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> On Feb 28, 2013
25.82
524288 80 105.83 4724.78
1048576 40 197.82 5055.05
2097152 20 791.35 2527.34
4194304 10 1820.30 2197.44
Regards, Pavel Mezentsev.
2013/2/28 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> On Feb 27, 20
arameters tuned for but perhaps it may be a good idea to change
the defaults for the kind of system I use.
I can perform some additional tests if necessary or give more information
on the problems that I've came across.
Regards, Pavel Mezentsev.
2013/2/27 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> The
rrors.
Not sure about the problem with pathscale but the first problem seems to be
a real error. Or did I miss something?
Regards, Pavel Mezentsev.
2013/2/26 Ralph Castain
>
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:40 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>
> > On 2/23/2013 11:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
&
Is there a way to specify collective depending on the size of the message
and number of processes?
Regards,
Pavel Mezentsev
2012/4/3 George Bosilca
> Roswan,
>
> There a re simpler solutions to achieve this. We have a built-in mechanism
> to select a specific collective implementat
; >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
> > ---
> > Application Performance Tools Group
> > Computer Science and Math Division
> > Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2012, at
ut
--bind-to-core is more convinient :)
2012/3/23 Ralph Castain
> I don't see where you told OMPI to --bind-to-core. We don't automatically
> bind, so you have to explicitly tell us to do so.
>
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Pavel Mezentsev wrote:
>
> > Hello
>
is a bug or me doing something not the way I should. So is
there a way to improve my results?
Best regards,
Pavel Mezentsev
