Re: [O-MPI devel] Memory registration question.

2005-08-09 Thread Timothy B. Prins
. Thanks, Tim Prins > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:20:38AM -0600, Timothy B. Prins wrote: >> Gleb. >> >> The memory pool does not support overlapping registrations. The >> registrations are stored in a balanced tree, so which ever of the two it >> encounters fi

Re: [O-MPI devel] Memory registration question.

2005-08-09 Thread Timothy B. Prins
Gleb. The memory pool does not support overlapping registrations. The registrations are stored in a balanced tree, so which ever of the two it encounters first it will return. Tim Prins > Hello, > > I am trying to understand how memory registration works in openMPI and > I have a question. Do

[O-MPI devel] New Bproc Components

2005-07-28 Thread Timothy B. Prins
All, I have removed the ompi_ignores from the new bproc components I have been working on and they are now the default for bproc. These new components have several advantages over the old bproc component but mainly: - we now provide ptys support for standard IO - it should work better with threa

Re: [O-MPI devel] bproc problem

2005-07-22 Thread Timothy B. Prins
Problem 2 should be fixed in the trunk. We now detect if the proper version of bproc is available, and we will abort configure if the proper version is not available and --with-bproc is passed. To disable bproc entirely, simply pass --without-bproc or --with-bproc=no to configure (this functionali

Re: [O-MPI devel] bproc problem

2005-07-22 Thread Timothy B. Prins
All, The 1st problem should be fixed in the trunk now. Tim > There appear to be 2 bproc problems in the tree right now: > > 1. I mailed Tim Prins / Greg Watson about one of them already (trying > to compile bproc on systems that don't have bproc -- perhaps related to > the .ompi_unignore from la