On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:18:06AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:35:41PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at
I committed a variant of this -- thanks!
I did not yet increase the required version of Libtool -- see my next
mail about this.
On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:38 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Troy,
* Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:38:02AM CEST:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > (It would be good to augment the autogen.sh script so that it honored
> > > a setting like
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > (It would be good to augment the autogen.sh script so that it honored
> > a setting like ACLOCAL="path/to/aclocal -I ..." (in Bourne shell speak)
> > and similarly for AUTOMAK
On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
(It would be good to augment the autogen.sh script so that it honored
a setting like ACLOCAL="path/to/aclocal -I ..." (in Bourne shell speak)
and similarly for AUTOMAKE, AUTOCONF, LIBTOOLIZE).
I have no objections to this... :-)
--
{+} Jef
* Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 04:18:06PM CEST:
>
> Did you manage to get this working on a debian system with just the
> newer version of libtool? Jeff suggests I build libtool and all the
> other autotools as well, but I'd like to see if I can avoid that, and
> just update libt
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:35:41PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:21:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > > I also get the followin
This is symptomatic of you not installing all 3 tools in the same
$prefix (I mentioned this on the phone yesterday). You *must* install
all 3 tools together (they have interdependencies). Check out the
HACKING file for details...
On Aug 25, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
failin
failing autogen.sh output at:
http://scl.ameslab.gov/~troy/ompi-autogen.log
I don't know what Libtool 1.6 is -- there is no such version.
I use Libtool 1.5.18.
(Troy and I talked on the phone and cleared up a bunch of stuff --
resolution was first to fix the Libtool stuff and recompile, and we'll
go from there -- potentially talking to Rich/Galen tomorrow when they
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:12:59PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >>> 42: 771 bytes 12011 times --> 1063.33 Mbps in 5.53 usec
> >>> 43:1021 bytes 6095 times --> mpirun noticed that job rank 1
> >>> with
> >>> PID 5569 on
On Aug 25, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
42: 771 bytes 12011 times --> 1063.33 Mbps in 5.53 usec
43:1021 bytes 6095 times --> mpirun noticed that job rank 1
with
PID 5569 on node "da5" exited on signal 11.
1 process killed (possibly by Open MPI)
What are you
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Galen Mark Shipman wrote:
>
> > What would you prefer I build from?
> >
> Build from svn if possible.
>
> > I figured out I need -mca mpi_leave_pinned 1, but now I get:
> This is correct.
>
> >
> > 42: 771 bytes 12011 times --> 1063.33 Mbps in
> What would you prefer I build from?
>
Build from svn if possible.
> I figured out I need -mca mpi_leave_pinned 1, but now I get:
This is correct.
>
> 42: 771 bytes 12011 times --> 1063.33 Mbps in 5.53 usec
> 43:1021 bytes 6095 times --> mpirun noticed that job rank 1 with
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:57:02AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >> Look for RTLD_GLOBAL in opal/libltdl/ltdl.c. If it is not there openib
> >> will not work if compiled as dynamic module. What version of libtool
> >> are
> >> you using? Ol
On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Look for RTLD_GLOBAL in opal/libltdl/ltdl.c. If it is not there openib
will not work if compiled as dynamic module. What version of libtool
are
you using? Older libtool haven't used RTLD_GLOBAL for opening
libraries.
It's not there...
tr
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:35:41PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:21:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > I also get the following messages on startup:
> > >
> > > libibverbs: Warning: no userspace
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:35:41PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:21:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > I also get the following messages on startup:
> >
> > libibverbs: Warning: no userspace device-specific driver found for
> > uverbs0 driver search path: /usr/lib/in
Is this the right command line for this?
mpirun -mca btl_openib_leave_pinned 1 -np 2 -host opteron1,opteron2
./NPmpi-openmpi -o /tmp/foo
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:48:31PM -0600, Galen M. Shipman wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> Tim and I would like to discuss this with you as well. One thing I
> would a
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:21:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I also get the following messages on startup:
>
> libibverbs: Warning: no userspace device-specific driver found for
> uverbs0 driver search path: /usr/lib/infiniband
> [0,1,1][btl_openib_component.c:267:mca_btl_openib_compo
Galen --
When you guys return to the office, it's probably worthwhile to see if
it's possible to set leave_pinned to 1 automatically if the memory
hooks are being set properly (Brian keeps explaining this stuff to me,
but it's so complicated that the details quickly fall out of my brain
;-) )
Hi Troy,
Tim and I would like to discuss this with you as well. One thing I
would ask, are you using the btl_mvapi_leave_pinned=1 option?
otherwise it is not a apples to apples comparison.
- Galen
On Aug 24, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
I have some Netpipe graphs of OpenMPI a
Hello Troy,
Can you forward the graphs? From the error output - doesn't
look like it's actually using IB - may be using TCP instead.
I won't be back in the office until friday - but could give you a call
then if you'd like.
Regards,
Tim
> I have some Netpipe graphs of OpenMPI and Mviapich on
I have some Netpipe graphs of OpenMPI and Mviapich on OpenIB gen2 on
Opteron systems, one with PCI-X IB cards, and the other with PCI-Express
DDR IB cards.
I'd like to chat with someone who fill me in a bit on what's going on
with performance, and how the BTL for IB is implemented. One thing I'd
l
24 matches
Mail list logo
