Got it -- thanks!
On Sep 5, 2005, at 4:39 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:45:41PM CEST:
On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
ltdl.h directly. This is both how
Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:45:41PM CEST:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >>> Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
> >>> ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how
> >>> it will work with Libtool 1.5
On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how
it will work with Libtool 1.5.x and 2.x: the latter has other
included files, which live one directory level further down
Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:58:05PM CEST:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:48 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
> > ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how
> > it will work with Libtool 1.5.x and
On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:48 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how
it will work with Libtool 1.5.x and 2.x: the latter has other
included files, which live one directory level further down
Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include
ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how
it will work with Libtool 1.5.x and 2.x: the latter has other
included files, which live one directory level further down.
Below is another tiny patch to please "make distche
