* Brian Barrett wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:53:33PM CET:
> Yup - Jeff found this one this morning. Stupid me testing on x86
> only :(. Anyway, this and your other one were just fixed in SVN.
Thank you very much, seems to work fine!
Cheers,
Ralf
Yup - Jeff found this one this morning. Stupid me testing on x86
only :(. Anyway, this and your other one were just fixed in SVN.
Brian
On Jan 13, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:28:09PM CET:
Did you mean this in your recent cha
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:28:09PM CET:
>
> Did you mean this in your recent changes to the trunk?
> I'm not quite sure, I don't really understand the code
> at a glance.
Hmm, another thing that fails here is that ompi_fortran_integer16_t gets
set to "not found" on GNU/Lin
Yeah, I should have used the m4_ifval :/. What platform were you
seeing badness on? I know there's something with gfortran on 64bit
linux and it seems to work on 32bit linux with gfortran.
Brian
On Jan 13, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Brian,
Did you mean this in your rece
Hi Brian,
Did you mean this in your recent changes to the trunk?
I'm not quite sure, I don't really understand the code
at a glance.
Without it, configure barfs over here because it contains
if ...; then
fi
somewhere, which is a shell syntax error.
Cheers,
Ralf
Index: config/f77_check.m4
==
