Brad,
On Sep 2, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Brad Penoff wrote:
hey Jeff/Galen,
Thanks to both of you for helping answer our questions, both on and off
the list. Currently, we're doing a lot of writing trying to focus on
MPI
implementation design strategies, so this has helped us certainly;
hopefully
hey Jeff/Galen,
Thanks to both of you for helping answer our questions, both on and off
the list. Currently, we're doing a lot of writing trying to focus on MPI
implementation design strategies, so this has helped us certainly;
hopefully others too.
On our end, generally, we've been trying
On Aug 31, 2005, at 1:06 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Brad Penoff wrote:
PML: Pretty much the same as it was described in the paper. Its
interface is basically MPI semantics (i.e., it sits right under
MPI_SEND and the rest).
BTL: Byte Transfer Layer; it's the next g
On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Brad Penoff wrote:
PML: Pretty much the same as it was described in the paper. Its
interface is basically MPI semantics (i.e., it sits right under
MPI_SEND and the rest).
BTL: Byte Transfer Layer; it's the next generation of PTL. The
BTL is
much more simple tha
Greetings,
Thanks for the clarity. I just had a few quick follow-up questions,
inline below.
brad
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Particularly, I'm just curious about the difference between pml-bml-btl
and the old pml-ptl (as described in your TEG paper) and why changes
were made.
On Aug 26, 2005, at 5:52 PM, Brad Penoff wrote:
I was just curious about the distinction between the pml, bml, and btl
layers within OpenMPI and was wondering if there was any place (other
than
the code ;-) where I could read about the design decisions. Any
pointers?
Unfortunately, not yet.
Greetings,
I was just curious about the distinction between the pml, bml, and btl
layers within OpenMPI and was wondering if there was any place (other than
the code ;-) where I could read about the design decisions. Any pointers?
Particularly, I'm just curious about the difference between p
