* Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:14:22PM CEST:
> I just had a thought on this one: In my environment on this
> platform I have LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 and LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 set. It
> seems possible to me that this is causing the loader to ignore the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting that
Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Paul,
* Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:11AM CEST:
I have been able to configure and build both 1.5rc5 and 1.4.3rc1 on
Solaris 10 for SPARC, using Sun C 5.10.
I have also build 1.5rc5 w/ gcc-3.3.2 (and expect 1.4.3rc1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Paul,
* Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:11AM CEST:
I have been able to configure and build both 1.5rc5 and 1.4.3rc1 on
Solaris 10 for SPARC, using Sun C 5.10.
I have also build 1.5rc5 w/ gcc-3.3.2 (and expect 1.4.3rc1 to build
w/ gcc as well
Hello Paul,
* Paul H. Hargrove wrote on Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:11AM CEST:
> I have been able to configure and build both 1.5rc5 and 1.4.3rc1 on
> Solaris 10 for SPARC, using Sun C 5.10.
> I have also build 1.5rc5 w/ gcc-3.3.2 (and expect 1.4.3rc1 to build
> w/ gcc as well, once I have time)
>
I have been able to configure and build both 1.5rc5 and 1.4.3rc1 on
Solaris 10 for SPARC, using Sun C 5.10.
I have also build 1.5rc5 w/ gcc-3.3.2 (and expect 1.4.3rc1 to build w/
gcc as well, once I have time)
All 3 builds fail "make check" in a way that suggests to me that libtool
is not work
