Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: Latency perf: v1.6 vs. v1.7 vs. trunk

2012-10-26 Thread Barrett, Brian W
On 10/25/12 10:55 AM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote: >Something that might not be clear from my initial writeup: > >1. I had to go change C code to disable libnbc. Since non-blocking >collectives are part of MPI-3: > a) we have no convenient configure argument to not build the libnbc >coll component (t

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: Latency perf: v1.6 vs. v1.7 vs. trunk

2012-10-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > Your first e-mail got eaten by our virus scanner (it doesn't like .bz2 > files), See http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/10/11638.php. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisc

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: Latency perf: v1.6 vs. v1.7 vs. trunk

2012-10-25 Thread Barrett, Brian W
Your first e-mail got eaten by our virus scanner (it doesn't like .bz2 files), but we could probably only register the libnbc progress function on first use, but it would slightly slow down all non blocking collectives. Probably worth it, but not sure I'll have time to add that code today. Brian