On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
It's already in the 1.2 !!! I don't know much you care about
performance, but I do. This patch increase by 10% the latency. It
might be cor
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
It's already in the 1.2 !!! I don't know much you care about
performance, but I do. This patch increase by 10% the latency. It
might be correct for the pathscale compiler, but it didn't look as
On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
It's already in the 1.2 !!! I don't know much you care about
performance, but I do. This patch increase by 10% the latency. It
might be correct for the pathscale compiler, but it didn't look as a
huge requirement for all others compilers. A memo
It's already in the 1.2 !!! I don't know much you care about
performance, but I do. This patch increase by 10% the latency. It
might be correct for the pathscale compiler, but it didn't look as a
huge requirement for all others compilers. A memory barrier for an
initialization and an unlock
