essage-
> > From: Tim Prins [mailto:tpr...@cs.indiana.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 09:44 AM Eastern Standard Time
> > To: de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subject:Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r16723
> >
> > Hi,
&g
gt; -jms
> Sent from my PDA
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Prins [mailto:tpr...@cs.indiana.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 09:44 AM Eastern Standard Time
> To: de...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r16723
&
:Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r16723
Hi,
The following files bother me about this commit:
trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.c
trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.h
They bother me for 2 reasons:
1. Their naming does not follow the prefix rule
2. They are LGPL licensed
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:44:06AM -0800, Tim Prins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following files bother me about this commit:
> trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.c
> trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.h
>
> They bother me for 2 reasons:
> 1. Their naming does not follow the prefix rule
> 2.
Hi,
The following files bother me about this commit:
trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.c
trunk/ompi/mca/btl/sctp/sctp_writev.h
They bother me for 2 reasons:
1. Their naming does not follow the prefix rule
2. They are LGPL licensed. While I personally like the LGPL, I do not
believe it
