I think the fix is fine as at it -- you're right; it's bad style and your macro
is clearly more robust.
Actually, we should probably wait and lump your fix into more ROMIO fixes to go
upstream -- I'm getting a *lot* of compiler warnings with this new ROMIO
version. I haven't looked into them y
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Eugene --
This ROMIO fix needs to go upstream.
Makes sense. Whom do I pester about that? Is r24356 (and now CMR 2712)
okay as is? The ROMIO change is an unimportant stylistic change, so I'm
okay cutting it loose from the other changes in the putback.
Eugene --
This ROMIO fix needs to go upstream.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:53 PM, eug...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: eugene
> Date: 2011-02-03 18:53:21 EST (Thu, 03 Feb 2011)
> New Revision: 24356
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/24356
>
> Log:
> Some minor changes to help the op
