Sounds great to me.
Aurelien
Le 11 sept. 07 à 13:03, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
If you genericize the concept, I think it's compatible with FT:
1. during MPI_INIT, one of the MPI processes can request a "notify"
exit pattern for the job: a process must notify the RTE before it
actually exits (i.e.
On Sep 8, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Aurelien Bouteiller wrote:
I agree (b) is not a good idea. However I am not very pleased by (a)
either. It totally prevent any process Fault Tolerant mechanism if we
go that way. If we plan to add some failure detection mechanism to
RTE and failure management (to avoi
Le 6 sept. 07 à 09:27, Terry D. Dontje a écrit :
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:50:43AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
WHAT: Decide upon how to handle MPI applications where one or more
processes exit without calling MPI_Finalize
WHY:Some applications can abort
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:50:43AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
WHAT: Decide upon how to handle MPI applications where one or more
processes exit without calling MPI_Finalize
WHY:Some applications can abort via an exit call instead of
calling MPI_Abo
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:50:43AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> WHAT: Decide upon how to handle MPI applications where one or more
> processes exit without calling MPI_Finalize
>
> WHY:Some applications can abort via an exit call instead of
> calling MPI_Abort when a libra
