Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2 failure with pgi-9.0-4 and -m32

2015-07-21 Thread Paul Hargrove
Ralph, Thanks for clarifying. -Paul On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Nathan reminded me today that we started requiring C99 in the 1.8 series, > so yes - 1.10 does require C99 > > I went ahead and removed the designators before he reminded me, but I’ll > leave them out a

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2 failure with pgi-9.0-4 and -m32

2015-07-21 Thread Ralph Castain
Nathan reminded me today that we started requiring C99 in the 1.8 series, so yes - 1.10 does require C99 I went ahead and removed the designators before he reminded me, but I’ll leave them out as they aren’t required > On Jul 21, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > Ralph, > > I know y

[OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2 failure with pgi-9.0-4 and -m32

2015-07-21 Thread Paul Hargrove
Ralph, I know you recently fixed a C99-related issue I saw in 1.10.0rc1 (removing designators in an initializer). So, I was surprised to see the following with pgi-9.0-4 and -m32: == Compiler and preprocessor tests