My OpenBSD-5.1 testers for both i386 and amd64 are failing the same tests as I reported a few minutes ago with respect to FreeBSD-6.3.
Unlike FreeBSD-6.3, this is "modern" system with OpenBSD 5.1 having been released Feb 2012. On both platforms I have builds w/ gcc-4.2.1 and with llvm-gcc-4.2.1. All 4 combinations of arch/compiler SEGV on the same 3 datatype tests. UNLIKE the FreeBSD-6.3 failures, the backtraces (though still numeric) have only a depth of 10 (at least in the cases I sampled at random in my limited time). FWIW: NetBSD-5.1 looks fine on both i386 and amd64 h/w. -Paul On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > On my FreeBSD-6.3/amd64 platform I see "make check" failing 3 tests under > test/datatype (see below). Of course "make" stops after that, making it > possible that additional tests might fail later. > > However, my records do show that the v1.5 branch was just fine on this > machine, as was the trunk on or about Feb 21, 2012. So, unless the failing > tests are new THIS IS A REGRESSION. > > Newer FreeBSD-7.2/amd64, FreeBSD-8.2/amd64 and FreeBSD-9.0/amd64 are all > OK. > > > The failures: > > $ grep -B1 ^FAIL $HOME/OMPI/openmpi-1.7rc5-freebsd6-amd64/LOG/check.log > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > FAIL: position > -- > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > FAIL: ddt_test > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > FAIL: ddt_raw > > Using gdb to get a backtrace from the generated core files shows a stack > over 1300 frames deep, which I suspect is either evidence of a corrupted > stack (buffer overflow?) or of infinite recursion. There are no symbols > with the backtrace, just numeric addresses. > > This is a rather old system > $ gcc --version | head -1 > gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 > > > -Paul > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks >> >> We have posted the next release candidate (rc5) for the 1.7.0 release in >> the usual place: >> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.7/ >> >> Please put it thru the wringer to help us validate it prior to release >> later this month. We think this looks pretty complete, pending someone >> finding a problem. >> >> Thanks >> Ralph >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> > > > > -- > Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov > Future Technologies Group > Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 > > -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
