Hi,
it is not required by spec but we have a patch which is in the latest
stages of verification.
hope it will make into trunk this week.
M
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
> Mike / Mellanox --
>
> Does does OpenShmem define that there should be a profiling interfa
Mike / Mellanox --
Does does OpenShmem define that there should be a profiling interface for SHMEM
API functions (like MPI does)?
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
> thanks, we will fix that.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hmmm...I'll ask the Me
thanks, we will fix that.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hmmm...I'll ask the Mellanox folks to fix that, but it will have to be for
> 1.8.1 as we have to release 1.8.0 today for the upstream packagers. I
> expect 1.8.1 will go out in the next 1-2 months based on prior e
Hmmm...I'll ask the Mellanox folks to fix that, but it will have to be for
1.8.1 as we have to release 1.8.0 today for the upstream packagers. I expect
1.8.1 will go out in the next 1-2 months based on prior experience (we always
get a bunch of corrections after initial stable release as more pe
Hi all,
while working on support for OpenShmem in our next Score-P measurement
[1] release, we noticed that the liboshmem.so library from Open MPI does
not mark the symbols as weak as one would expect. Here is an output of
liboshmem.so on my 64bit ubuntu system. Lets try shmem_init:
$ readel
