Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

Thank you guysdeeply appreciate your quick resolution to this problem On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote: > Exchange is evil…. > Attached. > > Best, > P > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > >> Can you gzip the patch. The local exchange serv

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

Exchange is evil…. Attached. Best, P p4.patch.gz Description: p4.patch.gz On Feb 7, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:Can you gzip the patch. The local exchange server has a habit ofconverting LF to CRLF.-NathanOn Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:14:02PM -0500, Shamis, Pavel w

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

Can you gzip the patch. The local exchange server has a habit of converting LF to CRLF. -Nathan On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:14:02PM -0500, Shamis, Pavel wrote: > Can you please give a try to the attached hot-fix. > It unrolls most of the spaghetti, except the iboffload component (which is > anywa

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

Hah. You beet me to it. More or less identical to what I was doing. I will give this a try. If this works we should push it and add it to the coll/ml cmr. -Nathan On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:14:02PM -0500, Shamis, Pavel wrote: > Can you please give a try to the attached hot-fix. > It unrolls most

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

Can you please give a try to the attached hot-fix. It unrolls most of the spaghetti, except the iboffload component (which is anyway disabled). Sorry for the mess. Best, Pasha On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Nathan Hjelm mailto:hje...@lanl.gov>> wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:46:03AM -0800, Ra

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > Should be ready today. The use of that coll/ml structure is unnecessary > at this time. I am removing it in bcol right now. In the future we will > put in a better fix but this should work for 1.7.x/1.8.x. Sweet. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisc

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

On Feb 7, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:46:03AM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote: >> The issue in 1.7 is all the cross-integration, which means we violate our >> normal behavior when it comes to no-building and user-directed component >> selection. Jeff and I jus

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:46:03AM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote: > The issue in 1.7 is all the cross-integration, which means we violate our > normal behavior when it comes to no-building and user-directed component > selection. Jeff and I just discussed how this could be resolved using the > PML-

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

The issue in 1.7 is all the cross-integration, which means we violate our normal behavior when it comes to no-building and user-directed component selection. Jeff and I just discussed how this could be resolved using the PML-BTL model, but (a) that is not what we have in 1.7, and (b) it isn't cl

Re: [OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

How is this a problem in 1.7? We don't have a .ompi_ignore in 1.7.4. That is there to prevent mtt failures while I fix some outstanding bcol issues. I will clean this up on trunk and add it to the cmr. -Nathan On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:42:27PM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote: > As many of you will h

[OMPI devel] Bcol/mcol violations

As many of you will have noticed, I have been struggling most of the evening with breakage on the trunk. This was initiated by adding .ompi_ignore to the coll/ml component, but the root cause of the problem is a blatant disregard for OMPI design rules in the bcol framework. Component-level heade