On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Paul Hargrove writes:
> > The GUIs for things like browsing commits, viewing diffs, etc are pretty
> > similar in capability and each is sufficiently intuitive (after a brief
> > learning curve) that I don't find I need any conscious effort to
Paul Hargrove writes:
> The GUIs for things like browsing commits, viewing diffs, etc are pretty
> similar in capability and each is sufficiently intuitive (after a brief
> learning curve) that I don't find I need any conscious effort to "mode
> switch" between their use. The ability to comment o
First off: this is not an attempt at a "strong objection" to delay or
change Jeff's stated plan.
Just my view as somebody who already contributes to projects hosted on both
GH and BB:
Since the bulk of the DVCS "work" as a developer is (in my experience) done
at the git command line, the choice o
I had a look at bitbucket.
SHORT VERSION
I'm inclined to stick with Github. If no one strongly disagrees, I'll proceed
with the GitHub migration next Wednesday, 1 Oct, 2014, starting at 8am US
Eastern.
MORE DETAIL
All in all, there is massive overlap of features between Github and Bitbucket.
