Ok, thanks for the confirmation.
On Apr 25, 2013, at 5:48 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Sure, it should be included in the 1.6 as well.
>
> George.
>
> On Apr 25, 2013, at 03:39 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
>> Ok; thanks.
>>
>> It looks like this should go to v1.6, too -- right (Nat
Sure, it should be included in the 1.6 as well.
George.
On Apr 25, 2013, at 03:39 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Ok; thanks.
>
> It looks like this should go to v1.6, too -- right (Nathan/George/Brian)?
>
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 9:31 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
>> This was already
Ok; thanks.
It looks like this should go to v1.6, too -- right (Nathan/George/Brian)?
On Apr 24, 2013, at 9:31 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> This was already resolved - Nathan applied it, and it has been moved into v1.7
>
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:53 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
> wrote:
>
>>
This was already resolved - Nathan applied it, and it has been moved into v1.7
On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:53 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
wrote:
> George / Brian / Nathan --
>
> Can you guys comment on this patch?
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Martin SCHREIBER
> wrote:
>
>> Dear developer
George / Brian / Nathan --
Can you guys comment on this patch?
On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Martin SCHREIBER wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> it seems that for messages of size 0 no convertor is created due to
> optimizations issues.
> However, this is not considered in MCA_PML_OB1_SEND_REQUEST_R
Dear developers,
it seems that for messages of size 0 no convertor is created due to
optimizations issues.
However, this is not considered in MCA_PML_OB1_SEND_REQUEST_RESET when
processing pending send requests.
A fix (or something similar) for this issue is provided below. Please be
aware, that
