Re: [OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

2007-10-11 Thread George Bosilca
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: George will have to answer this -- George? (he's on pseudo-vacation for the next 10 days) No, no, no. It's not pseudo at all :) It's as real as possible, when one still have access to email ... Anyway, I'm working out a way to enjoy every

Re: [OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

2007-10-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 10, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: George has proposed to bring the DDT over from the trunk to the v1.2 branch before v1.2.5 in order to fix some pending bugs. What does this entail (ie does this affect the pml interface at all)? George will have to answer this -- George? (he'

Re: [OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

2007-10-10 Thread Terry Dontje
Jeff Squyres wrote: George has proposed to bring the DDT over from the trunk to the v1.2 branch before v1.2.5 in order to fix some pending bugs. What does this entail (ie does this affect the pml interface at all)? Also by saying "before v1.2.5" I am assuming you mean this fix is to be put

[OMPI devel] DDT for v1.2 branch

2007-10-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
George has proposed to bring the DDT over from the trunk to the v1.2 branch before v1.2.5 in order to fix some pending bugs. I do not think that this has been tested yet, but are there any knee- jerk reactions against doing this? -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems