On Dec 14, 2011, at 6:51 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> To be honest I'm totally lost in the naming scheme, which got me confused
> about the RFC you're referring to. We had an MCA parameter to start a vm, so
> I thought VM is some kind of special virtualized environment and not the
> entire ORTE
To be honest I'm totally lost in the naming scheme, which got me confused about
the RFC you're referring to. We had an MCA parameter to start a vm, so I
thought VM is some kind of special virtualized environment and not the entire
ORTE. Based on the behavior of the trunk and the RFC you referred
On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> I noticed today a drastic change in how ORTE deal with the hostfile between
> trunk and 1.5.
>
> 1. 1.5 and prior used the hostile as a suggestion, a placeholder where to
> pick the requested number of daemons during the launch. The current t
I noticed today a drastic change in how ORTE deal with the hostfile between
trunk and 1.5.
1. 1.5 and prior used the hostile as a suggestion, a placeholder where to pick
the requested number of daemons during the launch. The current trunk spawn
daemons on all the nodes provided on the host file
