Thanks for the heads up. Fixed -- sorry about that.
> On Jul 4, 2015, at 12:11 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On OS X the generating the MPI library fails with the following error message:
>
> duplicate symbol _ompi_buffer_detach_f08 in:
> .libs/buffer_detach_f.o
> profile/.libs/libmpi
On OS X the generating the MPI library fails with the following error
message:
duplicate symbol _ompi_buffer_detach_f08 in:
.libs/buffer_detach_f.o
profile/.libs/libmpi_mpifh_pmpi.a(pbuffer_detach_f.o)
ld: 1 duplicate symbol for architecture x86_64
I came up with the following patch, but
Thankfully, I didn't understand it. :-)
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
>
>INTEGER JEFF(3)
>DATA JEFF/4HMR. ,4HFORT,3HRAN/
>
> If you can understand that, you should probably pretend you can't :-)
>
> -Paul [who has actually used Computed GO TO and Arith
Good grins. Thanks Paul.
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
ba...@usgs.gov
On 20 Feb 2015, at 11:49 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
>INTEGER JEFF(3)
>DATA JEFF/4HMR. ,4HFORT,3HRAN/
>
> If you can understand that, you should probably pretend you can't :-)
>
> -Paul [wh
INTEGER JEFF(3)
DATA JEFF/4HMR. ,4HFORT,3HRAN/
If you can understand that, you should probably pretend you can't :-)
-Paul [who has actually used Computed GO TO and Arithmetic IF]
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Larry Baker wrote:
> Excellent, Mr. Fortran. Thank you.
>
> By th
Excellent, Mr. Fortran. Thank you.
By the way, I meant to write Branch ON Low Bit Set/Clear.
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
ba...@usgs.gov
On 20 Feb 2015, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Larry Baker wrote:
>>
>> Beware, this has/may
On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Larry Baker wrote:
>
> Beware, this has/may not always be the case. This is due to C's historical
> confusion/misuse of integers as boolean data types. On VAX hardware, the low
> bit was the only significant part of a Fortran LOGICAL data type, owing to
> the arc
On 20 Feb 2015, at 3:09 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> George,
>
> this is correctly handled in ompi_testany_f :
>
> /* Increment index by one for fortran conventions. Note that
>all Fortran compilers have FALSE==0; we just need to check
>for any nonzero value
On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:01 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> Great. Using grep I couldn't find how this is handled anywhere in the source
> directory. But it seems to me that the Fortran layer is now way more
> complicated than I initially thought.
Fortran is your friend.
(repeat until you believe
Great. Using grep I couldn't find how this is handled anywhere in the
source directory. But it seems to me that the Fortran layer is now way more
complicated than I initially thought.
George.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Gilles is correct. The same kind
Gilles is correct. The same kind of increment happens in all the test/wait
Fortran code that returns indexes.
"Mr. Fortran"? Ouch. :-)
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:09 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> wrote:
>
> George,
>
> this is correctly handled in ompi_testany_f :
>
> /* Increment index
George,
this is correctly handled in ompi_testany_f :
/* Increment index by one for fortran conventions. Note that
all Fortran compilers have FALSE==0; we just need to check
for any nonzero value (because TRUE is not always 1) */
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2015/02/20 1:15
Sorry but I miss the connection between this test and the issue of TestAny
in Fortran?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Dave Goodell (dgoodell) wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:15 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> > While looking the MPI_Testany issue, I came across a very unsettling
> sentence in
On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:15 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> While looking the MPI_Testany issue, I came across a very unsettling sentence
> in the MPI standard (3.0 page 58 line 36).
>
> > The array is indexed from zero in C, and from one in Fortran.
>
> This sentence seems to indicate that the inde
While looking the MPI_Testany issue, I came across a very unsettling
sentence in the MPI standard (3.0 page 58 line 36).
> The array is indexed from zero in C, and from one in Fortran.
This sentence seems to indicate that the index returned by the TestAny and
TestSome (as well as the correspondin
15 matches
Mail list logo
