On Apr 25, 2012, at 13:59 , Alex Margolin wrote:
> I guess you are right.
>
> I started looking into the communication passing between processes and I may
> have found a problem with the way I handle "reserved" data requested at
> prepare_src()... I've tried to write pretty much the same as
Alex,
You got the banner of the FT benchmark, so I guess at least the rank 0
successfully completed the MPI_Init call. This is a hint that you should
investigate more into the point-to-point logic of your mosix BTL.
george.
On Apr 25, 2012, at 09:30 , Alex Margolin wrote:
> NAS Parallel
Another thing to try is to load up the core file in gdb and see if that gives
you a valid stack trace of where exactly the segv occurred.
On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Alex Margolin wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 02:57 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Strange that your code didn't generate any symbols - is
On 04/25/2012 02:57 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Strange that your code didn't generate any symbols - is that a mosix thing?
Have you tried just adding opal_output (so it goes to a special diagnostic
output channel) statements in your code to see where the segfault is occurring?
It looks like you
Strange that your code didn't generate any symbols - is that a mosix thing?
Have you tried just adding opal_output (so it goes to a special diagnostic
output channel) statements in your code to see where the segfault is occurring?
It looks like you are getting thru orte_init. You could add -mca
