On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Should we consider moving towards these mapped addresses? The
implications:
- less code, only one socket to handle
- better FD consumption
- breaks WinXP support, but not Vista/Longhorn or later
- requires non-default kernel runtime setting on Op
Hi!
The current BTL/TCP and OOB/TCP code contains separate sockets for IPv4
and IPv6. Though it has never been a problem for me, this might cause an
out-of-FDs-error in large clusters. (IIRC, rhc has already pointed out
this issue)
A possible way to reduce FD consumption would be the use of IPv4
