I've talked with both Brian and Rich about the measurements and they are
ok with the new findings. I also have not received any other comments
to the negative on putting 1097 into the v1.2 branch. So I would like
to instruct Tim Mattox to bring over the 1097 change to v1.2 branch and
make a n
: Wed Sep 19 15:59:38 2007
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Message Queue debugging support for1.2.4
Nikolay and Community,
Sorry to be so late in responding to your email but I've been working
with Pak to determine whether my hasty decision as RM yesterday was
hasty or not. To answer your questio
- Original Message -
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org
To: Open MPI Developers
Sent: Wed Sep 19 15:59:38 2007
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Message Queue debugging support for1.2.4
Nikolay and Community,
Sorry to be so late in responding to your email but I've been working
with Pak to determine wh
This all sounds reasonable to me. I agree -- now that the dramatic
performance difference has been explained and we're within a tiny
delta (that's likely simply the normal testing variance), let's put
the MQ stuff in 1.2.4.
(BTW, I didn't surmise that Pak had debugging enabled; I think he
Nikolay and Community,
Sorry to be so late in responding to your email but I've been working
with Pak to determine whether my hasty decision as RM yesterday was
hasty or not. To answer your question, we are still trying to determine
if the message queue support can go in or not and the below
Hi,
Just to verify, before I'll start testing this, there will be no message
queue debugging support in this version, correct? This all goes to 1.3 release.
Best Regards,
P.S. It looks like it is time for us to be more formally involved in this work.
Nikolay Piskun
Director of Continuing
