On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it
> to the no-auth way for a reason.
Are you obliquely saying that there's a reason to have no-auth https access?
DongInn and I changed it because we're still havi
[mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:24 AM
> To: Open Developers
> Subject: [OMPI devel] Minor OMPI SVN configuration change
>
> We have made a minor change in OMPI's SVN configuration:
>
> If you access the SVN repo over https, you *mu
Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it
to the no-auth way for a reason.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:24 AM
To: Open Developers
Subject: [OMPI devel] Mino
We have made a minor change in OMPI's SVN configuration:
If you access the SVN repo over https, you *must* authenticate.
Previously, you could authenticate or not; SVN would serve up what was
appropriate in either case (there's one "private" tree in the SVN repo for
not-yet-published academ
