y to go as soon as all BTL developers raise the
>>>>>>> green flag. I got it from Jeff (but the last USNIC commit broke
>>>>>>> something), and myself. In other words, TCP, self, SM and USNIC are
>>>>>>> good to go. For the others, as I
last USNIC commit broke
>>>>>> something), and myself. In other words, TCP, self, SM and USNIC are good
>>>>>> to go. For the others, as I didn't heard back from their
>>>>>> developers/maintainers, I assume they are not yet ready. Here I
om their
>>>>> developers/maintainers, I assume they are not yet ready. Here I am
>>>>> referring to OpenIB, Portals4, Scif, smcuda, ugni, usnic and vader.
>>>>>
>>>>> George.
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: As a reminde
t;>>>> to go. For the others, as I didn't heard back from their
>>>>> developers/maintainers, I assume they are not yet ready. Here I am
>>>>> referring to OpenIB, Portals4, Scif, smcuda, ugni, usnic and vader.
>>>>>
>>
;>>> https://bitbucket.org/bosilca/ompi-btl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Pritchard, Howard P
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Now work is planned for the uGNI
;> PS: As a reminder the code is available at
>>> https://bitbucket.org/bosilca/ompi-btl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Pritchard, Howard P
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Now work is planned for the uG
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Now work is planned for the uGNI BTL at this time either.
>>
>> Howard
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
>> (jsquyres)
>> Sent
>
> Now work is planned for the uGNI BTL at this time either.
>
> Howard
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> (jsquyres)
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 5:04 PM
> To: Open MPI Developers List
>
11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Pritchard, Howard P wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Now work is planned for the uGNI BTL at this time either.
>
> Howard
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> (jsquyres)
en-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> (jsquyres)
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 5:04 PM
> To: Open MPI Developers List
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Move the Open MPI communication
> infrastructure in OPAL
>
> FWIW: I can't speak for other BTL maintainers, but I
the Open MPI communication infrastructure
in OPAL
FWIW: I can't speak for other BTL maintainers, but I'm out of the office for
the next week, and the usnic BTL will be standing still during that time. Once
I return, I will be making additional changes in the usnic BTL (new features
FWIW: I can't speak for other BTL maintainers, but I'm out of the office for
the next week, and the usnic BTL will be standing still during that time. Once
I return, I will be making additional changes in the usnic BTL (new features,
updates, ...etc.).
So if you have the cycles, doing it in th
George: any update on when this will happen?
On Jun 4, 2014, at 9:14 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> WHAT:Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all
> necessary components
> (btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL
>
> WHY: All the components required for inte
WHAT:Open our low-level communication infrastructure by moving all
necessary components
(btl/rcache/allocator/mpool) down in OPAL
WHY: All the components required for inter-process communications are
currently deeply integrated in the OMPI
layer. Several groups/ins
14 matches
Mail list logo
