The general consensus has been that the new Fortran stuff is ready to go in.
Per Josh's comments on the original RFC, I've updated all the mpiext stuff to
handle the 3 new MPI Fortran interfaces (mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08).
I plan to commit this to the OMPI trunk tomorrow (Wed, Apr 18, 2
On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> All of the ones I am adding :) [most of the codes I am working with at
> the moment use the fortran interfaces]
You're killing me. :-)
> I think the 'example' extension is the only one that has f77
> interfaces at the moment. My off-trunk branche
All of the ones I am adding :) [most of the codes I am working with at
the moment use the fortran interfaces]
I think the 'example' extension is the only one that has f77
interfaces at the moment. My off-trunk branches have f77/f90
interfaces to their mpiext interfaces.
I'm willing to help test/d
On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the
> branch it doesn't look like it has been touched.
Yeah, I've been thinking about this -- especially since you committed something
relevant to mpiext the other day.
You're right
Jeff,
What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the
branch it doesn't look like it has been touched.
-- Josh
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote:
> WHAT: Revamp the entire MPI Fortran bindings; new "mpifort" wrapper compiler
>
> WHY: Much better mpi modu
WHAT: Revamp the entire MPI Fortran bindings; new "mpifort" wrapper compiler
WHY: Much better mpi module implementation; addition of MPI-3 mpi_f08 module
WHERE: Remove ompi/mpi/f77 and ompi/mpi/f90, replace with ompi/mpi/fortran
TIMEOUT: Teleconf, Tue Apr 17, 2012
==
