George,
When asked about MTL versus BTL, we always suggest that users try both
with their application and determine which is best. I have had
customers report the BTL is better on Solaris (memory registration is
expensive and the BTL can overlap registration and communication when
it frag
Here is an alternative solution. If instead of setting a hard coded
value for the priority of CM, we make it use the priority of the MTL
that get selected, we can solve this problem on a case by case
approach by carefully setting the MTL's priority (bump up the portals
and PSM one and decre
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Rainer Keller wrote:
When compiling on systems with MX or Portals, we offer MTLs and BTLs.
If MTLs are used, the PML/CM is loaded as well as the PML/OB1.
Question 1: Is favoring OB1 over CM required for any MTL (MX, Portals, PSM)?
George has in the past had srtong feelin
Hello all,
as raised on todays telcon:
WHAT: Obeying or lowering default priority of PML/CM.
WHY: Not obvious why MTLs are not used for Portals/MX
WHEN: On trunk, Tuesday afternoon 18 Aug 2009
On 1.3 by CMR on 25 Aug 2009
TIMEOUT: Tuesday telconf, 18 Aug 2009
