Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Suspend/resume enhancements

2010-01-27 Thread Iain Bason
Having heard no further comments, I plan to integrate this into the trunk on Monday. Iain On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: This only happens when the orte_forward_job_control MCA flag is set to 1 and the default is that it is set to 0. Which I believe meets Ralph's criteri

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Suspend/resume enhancements

2010-01-05 Thread Terry Dontje
This only happens when the orte_forward_job_control MCA flag is set to 1 and the default is that it is set to 0. Which I believe meets Ralph's criteria below. --td Ralph Castain wrote: I don't have any issue with this so long as (a) it is -only- active when someone sets a specific MCA param

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Suspend/resume enhancements

2010-01-05 Thread Ralph Castain
I don't have any issue with this so long as (a) it is -only- active when someone sets a specific MCA param requesting it, and (b) that flag is -not- set by default. On Jan 4, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Iain Bason wrote: > WHAT: Enhance the orte_forward_job_control MCA flag by: > > 1. Forwarding sign

[OMPI devel] RFC: Suspend/resume enhancements

2010-01-04 Thread Iain Bason
WHAT: Enhance the orte_forward_job_control MCA flag by: 1. Forwarding signals to descendants of launched processes; and 2. Forwarding signals received before process launch time. (The orte_forward_job_control flag arranges for SIGTSTP and SIGCONT to be forwarded. This allows a resource mana