Thanks for adding the capability to stop processing the callbacks. For the rest
I have no preferences, lets move forward with what's in there and adapt if new
needs appear.
Thanks,
George.
On Jul 15, 2013, at 16:05 , Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:45 AM, George Bosilca
On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:45 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> Sorry for the late answer, we have quite a few things on our todo list right
> now. Here are few concerns I'm having about the proposed approach.
>
> 1. We would have preferred to have a list of processes for the
> ompi_errhandl
Ralph,
Sorry for the late answer, we have quite a few things on our todo list right
now. Here are few concerns I'm having about the proposed approach.
1. We would have preferred to have a list of processes for the
ompi_errhandler_runtime_callback function. We don't necessary care about the
err
NOTICE: This RFC modifies the MPI-RTE interface WHAT: revise the RTE error handling to allow registration of callbacks upon RTE-detected errorsWHY: currently, the RTE aborts the process if an RTE-detected error occurs. This allows the upper layers (e.g., MPI) no chance to implement their o
