Yes - thanks! One note about the threading changes. We will need to sequence those a bit. IIRC, the current OOB isn't happy when you turn on opal thread support and can "wedge" itself. I also suspect we'll want the MPI_Waitall fix before we enable thread multiple by default.
On Jun 7, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > I updated the notes -- better now? > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > >> Hmmm....there seem to be some typos in this posting. For example, you say >> that both I and Aure will do the orte classes for the single-vs-multi thread >> APIs. Could you take a glance thru it and clean up a bit? I'm not sure which >> answer is correct. >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I finally posted the rest of the meeting notes. Pay particular attention >>> to what was discussed and the action items from Tuesday: >>> >>> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/Jun13Meeting >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Squyres >>> jsquy...@cisco.com >>> For corporate legal information go to: >>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> de...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
