Yes - thanks!
One note about the threading changes. We will need to sequence those a bit.
IIRC, the current OOB isn't happy when you turn on opal thread support and can
"wedge" itself. I also suspect we'll want the MPI_Waitall fix before we enable
thread multiple by default.
On Jun 7, 2013, a
I updated the notes -- better now?
On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hmmmthere seem to be some typos in this posting. For example, you say
> that both I and Aure will do the orte classes for the single-vs-multi thread
> APIs. Could you take a glance thru it and clean up a
Hmmmthere seem to be some typos in this posting. For example, you say that
both I and Aure will do the orte classes for the single-vs-multi thread APIs.
Could you take a glance thru it and clean up a bit? I'm not sure which answer
is correct.
On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquy
I finally posted the rest of the meeting notes. Pay particular attention to
what was discussed and the action items from Tuesday:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/Jun13Meeting
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/d
